AN ARCHIVE OF PRINTED EPHEMERA,
BODLEIAN LIBRARY, OXFORD
Dara, Gillian, Traci and I were very lucky to have a thorough and detailed tour of the John Johnson Archive of printed ephemera, which is housed at the Bodleian Library in Oxford. Our guide was Amanda Flynn, who is an archivist at the Bodleian. The collection is housed in the new Bodleian Library, with workshops being on the ground floor, and materials being stored mostly in the stacks.

John de Monins Johnson (1882-1956) worked for the Oxford University Press (OUP), and the collection is named after him. Amanda explained that Johnson was a papyrologist, and his studies of fragile ancient Egyptian texts, lead him to realize that printed materials from his own era were just as fragile, and just as likely to be thrown in the trash. So he started a collection of printed ephemera, now containing approximately 1.5 million items, dating mostly from the 18th ,19th and 20th Centuries, with the cut-off date being WW2. Initially housed at the OUP offices, the collection was gifted to the university in 1968.
The collection includes a vast range of printed items. Playbills, programs, prints, newspapers, handbills and pamphlets sit alongside advertizing materials of all types. This collection is an invaluable resource for many different kinds of researchers, from those looking to see what an Edwardian theatre playbill looked like, to a hastily published newspaper, giving an account of a public hanging in the Victorian era. Because of the huge quantity of material, cataloging is critical for efficient access. Johnson himself cataloged his collection. Amanda conceded that the 700 subject headings that he created for his materials were so good that it is the one that is still broadly used today.
In 2006, a large scale joint-venture digitizing program was established between ProQuest and the Bodleian, under the auspices of the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). JISC put up the funding with the aim of preserving and protecting fragile collections such as this one. ProQuest put up half of the £2m budget and JISC the other half. The agreement was that UK- based libraries and schools would have free access to the digitized collection, and those outside the UK would have to enter into a contract with ProQuest to be able to access the images.
It was seen as being unrealistic that the whole of the collection could be digitized, so the £2 m was spent scanning 62,421 items (167,356 images) and creating 60,300 new catalog entries. Amanda showed us multiple examples of the five categories of materials that were nominated for early inclusion;
* 19th Century Entertainment, including theater material and non-theatrical materials, such as circuses.
* Popular Prints. This category provides researchers with a huge range of visual information of both social and historical significance.
* Crime, Murders and Executions. Broadsides and pamphlets from court cases, and more lurid publications of grisly crimes are a treasure trove for researchers.
* The Book Trade. Examples of book publishing ephemera, including prospectuses and bookplates.
* Advertizing. This is popular culture in the raw, and is a rich vein for students of fashion, industrial processes, social/historical trends and habits, etc.

The workroom in the New Bodleian Library: A small selection of the collection.
The work commenced in 2007, took two years and involved 10 staff from the Bodleian. The academic input was provided by Bodleian staff and the digitization process was broken down into four discreet processes;
1. Sorting. The items were put into categories and given shelf marks.
2. Cataloging. New records were created, using the Allegro Bibliographic format. The catalog entries thus created are very complex, allowing multiple entry points for searching. Researchers may be researching theater history, or the history of an actor, or the typography used in early Victorian playbills. Amanda explained that a playbill might have included references to the theater, the name of the play, the theater manager, the players, a description of items contained in pictures included in the playbill and so on. Additional information would be included on dimensions, coloring, printing and paper processes used, etc. (i.e. copper engraving, wood block, Baxter-print etc). Only by including multiple search terms in the catalog entry, would this resource be of any future use to researchers. At this stage the paper conservation department did any necessary work needed to repair or conserve the item.
3. Tracking. Each item was assigned a barcode tracking number, allowing all the different departments to locate precisely where an item was at any given time.
4. Digitizing. The bulk of this work was done by an outside contractor, Capita, who are based in the nearby town of Bicester. Some of the more delicate time-consuming items were digitized in-house at the Bodleian.
Amanda then went on to show us how efficacious the search processes are. The work put into cataloging the collection, started by John Johnson, has paid off handsomely, because a part of this unique resource is now searchable and accessible in many different ways. For the first time, Johnson’s collection will open up its secrets in interesting and diverse ways to researchers working in many different fields.
I have used all of the web-sites listed below in researching this blog.
This web-site gives a brief history of the collection within the Bodleian:
http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/johnson/johnson.htmThis site provides a lot of additional information:
http://johnjohnson.chadwyck.co.uk/marketing/about.jsp
More detail on the digitizing process can be found at: